EMK CONSULTING

Public policy and programme evaluation

EMK Consulting assesses the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and impact of public policies and programmes — direct-support schemes, subsidies, housing, agricultural or enterprise-support programmes — and turns findings into operational recommendations.

International advisory team reviewing technical and strategic plans
Expertise assembled around the mandate
Public programme evaluation and field data analysis
Sector perspective · EMK Consulting

Understanding the challenge

Evaluating a public programme requires connecting administrative data, field surveys, economic analysis and institutional understanding. Our approach combines quantitative and qualitative methods, interviews with beneficiaries and implementing actors, and rigorous budget analysis, to produce defensible conclusions and realistic guidance.

How we can support

01

Evaluation of public programmes and schemes

Relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impact and sustainability of direct-support, subsidy and assistance programmes, at mid-term or completion.

02

Beneficiary and stakeholder surveys

Sampling design, questionnaires, household and enterprise surveys, interviews and focus groups with beneficiaries, operators, financial institutions and administrations.

03

Economic and budget analysis

Cost-effectiveness, budget cost, tax expenditure, sustainability and socio-economic impact of support schemes.

04

Housing and urban development

Evaluation of housing and homeownership-support programmes, territorial supply-demand balance, quality and urban integration of delivered projects.

05

Process and management-platform audit

Application journeys, controls, processing times, information systems and digital platforms managing support schemes.

06

Forward-looking scenarios and recommendations

Options for evolution, targeting, governance and roadmaps beyond the end of the programme.

What the assignment should enable

01

Defensible findings

Traceable conclusions grounded in data and explicit methods.

02

Realistic recommendations

Guidance connected to capabilities, budgets and institutional constraints.

03

Informed decisions

Costed scenarios to extend, adjust or redirect the scheme.

Questions commonly addressed

Public policy and programme evaluation

  • How should a final or mid-term evaluation be structured?
  • How can reliable beneficiary surveys be organised?
  • How can the impact and budget cost of a support scheme be measured?